Estonia vs Finland: Electricity Compared
Estonia generated 6.14 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Finland 82.5 TWh, according to Ember. Estonia's largest source was other fossil (38.9%); Finland's was nuclear (39.8%). Each kWh generated emitted 319 gCO2/kWh in Estonia and 59 gCO2/kWh in Finland. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Finland is the bigger electricity producer, generating 13.4 times as much as Estonia in 2025 (82.5 TWh against 6.14 TWh). Finland has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 59 gCO2/kWh against 319 gCO2/kWh in Estonia in 2025.
Why this comparison: neighbours by land border or interconnector.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Nuclear supplied 39.8% of Finland's electricity in 2025, against none in Estonia.
- Estonia's electricity was 5.4 times as carbon intensive as Finland's in 2025, at 319 gCO2/kWh against 59 gCO2/kWh.
- Electricity demand rose 4% in Finland between 2020 and 2025, while it fell 9% in Estonia.
- The average person in Finland used 15.62 MWh of electricity in 2025, 2.4 times as much as in Estonia (6.62 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 59.8% of Estonia's electricity in 2025 and 96.2% of Finland's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 8.85 TWh in Estonia and 88.0 TWh in Finland.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Estonia | Finland |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 6.14 TWh | 82.5 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 8.85 TWh | 88.0 TWh |
| Demand per person | 6.62 MWh | 15.62 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 319 gCO2/kWh | 59 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 1.96 MtCO2 | 4.85 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 59.8% | 96.2% |
| Largest source | Other fossil 38.9% | Nuclear 39.8% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Estonia | Finland |
|---|---|---|
| Nuclear | 0.0% | 39.8% |
| Other fossil | 38.9% | 2.3% |
| Wind | 18.6% | 27.4% |
| Bioenergy | 21.8% | 12.5% |
| Solar | 18.9% | 1.2% |
| Hydro | 0.5% | 15.1% |
| Gas | 1.3% | 1.1% |
| Coal | 0.0% | 0.4% |
| Other renewables | 0.0% | 0.2% |
Carbon Intensity, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Estonia | Finland |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 640 gCO2/kWh | 282 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 636 gCO2/kWh | 276 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 650 gCO2/kWh | 245 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 653 gCO2/kWh | 278 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 650 gCO2/kWh | 337 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 648 gCO2/kWh | 304 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 648 gCO2/kWh | 351 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 648 gCO2/kWh | 319 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 647 gCO2/kWh | 250 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 648 gCO2/kWh | 263 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 634 gCO2/kWh | 247 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 633 gCO2/kWh | 285 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 636 gCO2/kWh | 316 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 639 gCO2/kWh | 371 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 639 gCO2/kWh | 325 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 634 gCO2/kWh | 231 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 632 gCO2/kWh | 336 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 642 gCO2/kWh | 309 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 634 gCO2/kWh | 246 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 621 gCO2/kWh | 276 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 610 gCO2/kWh | 315 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 605 gCO2/kWh | 268 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 592 gCO2/kWh | 215 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 606 gCO2/kWh | 257 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 597 gCO2/kWh | 227 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 573 gCO2/kWh | 182 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 588 gCO2/kWh | 200 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 583 gCO2/kWh | 186 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 574 gCO2/kWh | 194 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 511 gCO2/kWh | 171 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 404 gCO2/kWh | 130 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 450 gCO2/kWh | 136 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 487 gCO2/kWh | 130 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 395 gCO2/kWh | 81 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 344 gCO2/kWh | 67 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 319 gCO2/kWh | 59 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Estonia | Finland |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 5.43 MWh | 15.81 MWh |
| 2001 | 5.67 MWh | 16.27 MWh |
| 2002 | 5.68 MWh | 16.70 MWh |
| 2003 | 6.03 MWh | 17.10 MWh |
| 2004 | 6.25 MWh | 17.35 MWh |
| 2005 | 6.34 MWh | 16.69 MWh |
| 2006 | 6.67 MWh | 17.79 MWh |
| 2007 | 7.28 MWh | 17.72 MWh |
| 2008 | 7.21 MWh | 16.96 MWh |
| 2009 | 6.64 MWh | 15.76 MWh |
| 2010 | 7.30 MWh | 16.99 MWh |
| 2011 | 7.03 MWh | 16.21 MWh |
| 2012 | 7.35 MWh | 16.23 MWh |
| 2013 | 7.35 MWh | 15.99 MWh |
| 2014 | 7.38 MWh | 15.76 MWh |
| 2015 | 7.02 MWh | 15.50 MWh |
| 2016 | 7.70 MWh | 15.96 MWh |
| 2017 | 7.92 MWh | 15.97 MWh |
| 2018 | 7.92 MWh | 16.35 MWh |
| 2019 | 7.36 MWh | 16.06 MWh |
| 2020 | 7.31 MWh | 15.25 MWh |
| 2021 | 7.37 MWh | 16.22 MWh |
| 2022 | 7.37 MWh | 15.21 MWh |
| 2023 | 6.61 MWh | 14.86 MWh |
| 2024 | 6.75 MWh | 15.26 MWh |
| 2025 | 6.62 MWh | 15.62 MWh |
Estonia history · Finland history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Estonia vs Finland: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/estonia-vs-finland/
World Power Monitor. Estonia vs Finland: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/estonia-vs-finland/
@misc{wpm_compare_estonia_vs_finland_2025,
title = {{Estonia vs Finland: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/estonia-vs-finland/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/estonia-vs-finland/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.