Finland vs Russia: Electricity Compared
Finland generated 82.5 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Russia 1,194 TWh, according to Ember. Finland's largest source was nuclear (39.8%); Russia's was gas (45.6%). Each kWh generated emitted 59 gCO2/kWh in Finland and 447 gCO2/kWh in Russia. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Russia is the bigger electricity producer, generating 14.5 times as much as Finland in 2025 (1,194 TWh against 82.5 TWh). Finland has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 59 gCO2/kWh against 447 gCO2/kWh in Russia in 2025.
Why this comparison: neighbours by land border or interconnector.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Gas supplied 45.6% of Russia's electricity in 2025, against 1.1% in Finland.
- Russia's electricity was 7.6 times as carbon intensive as Finland's in 2025, at 447 gCO2/kWh against 59 gCO2/kWh.
- Carbon intensity rose 7% in Russia between 2020 and 2025, while it fell 55% in Finland.
- Low carbon sources supplied 96.2% of Finland's electricity in 2025 and 35.7% of Russia's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 88.0 TWh in Finland and 1,178 TWh in Russia.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Finland | Russia |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 82.5 TWh | 1,194 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 88.0 TWh | 1,178 TWh |
| Demand per person | 15.62 MWh | 8.17 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 59 gCO2/kWh | 447 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 4.85 MtCO2 | 534 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 96.2% | 35.7% |
| Largest source | Nuclear 39.8% | Gas 45.6% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Finland | Russia |
|---|---|---|
| Gas | 1.1% | 45.6% |
| Nuclear | 39.8% | 18.3% |
| Wind | 27.4% | 0.3% |
| Coal | 0.4% | 17.7% |
| Hydro | 15.1% | 16.7% |
| Bioenergy | 12.5% | 0.1% |
| Other fossil | 2.3% | 1.0% |
| Solar | 1.2% | 0.2% |
| Other renewables | 0.2% | 0.0% |
Carbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Finland | Russia |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | 492 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | n/a | 492 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | n/a | 489 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | n/a | 486 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | n/a | 488 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 282 gCO2/kWh | 496 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 276 gCO2/kWh | 492 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 245 gCO2/kWh | 483 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 278 gCO2/kWh | 473 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 337 gCO2/kWh | 481 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 304 gCO2/kWh | 477 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 351 gCO2/kWh | 482 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 319 gCO2/kWh | 477 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 250 gCO2/kWh | 482 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 263 gCO2/kWh | 468 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 247 gCO2/kWh | 470 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 285 gCO2/kWh | 458 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 316 gCO2/kWh | 463 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 371 gCO2/kWh | 465 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 325 gCO2/kWh | 454 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 231 gCO2/kWh | 457 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 336 gCO2/kWh | 463 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 309 gCO2/kWh | 458 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 246 gCO2/kWh | 475 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 276 gCO2/kWh | 452 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 315 gCO2/kWh | 458 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 268 gCO2/kWh | 461 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 215 gCO2/kWh | 462 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 257 gCO2/kWh | 450 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 227 gCO2/kWh | 449 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 182 gCO2/kWh | 444 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 200 gCO2/kWh | 443 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 186 gCO2/kWh | 440 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 194 gCO2/kWh | 439 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 171 gCO2/kWh | 440 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 130 gCO2/kWh | 418 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 136 gCO2/kWh | 427 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 130 gCO2/kWh | 443 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 81 gCO2/kWh | 447 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 67 gCO2/kWh | 444 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 59 gCO2/kWh | 447 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Finland | Russia |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 15.81 MWh | 5.89 MWh |
| 2001 | 16.27 MWh | 5.99 MWh |
| 2002 | 16.70 MWh | 6.02 MWh |
| 2003 | 17.10 MWh | 6.19 MWh |
| 2004 | 17.35 MWh | 6.37 MWh |
| 2005 | 16.69 MWh | 6.51 MWh |
| 2006 | 17.79 MWh | 6.78 MWh |
| 2007 | 17.72 MWh | 6.99 MWh |
| 2008 | 16.96 MWh | 7.11 MWh |
| 2009 | 15.76 MWh | 6.80 MWh |
| 2010 | 16.99 MWh | 7.09 MWh |
| 2011 | 16.21 MWh | 7.17 MWh |
| 2012 | 16.23 MWh | 7.30 MWh |
| 2013 | 15.99 MWh | 7.23 MWh |
| 2014 | 15.76 MWh | 7.29 MWh |
| 2015 | 15.50 MWh | 7.27 MWh |
| 2016 | 15.96 MWh | 7.38 MWh |
| 2017 | 15.97 MWh | 7.39 MWh |
| 2018 | 16.35 MWh | 7.49 MWh |
| 2019 | 16.06 MWh | 7.51 MWh |
| 2020 | 15.25 MWh | 7.34 MWh |
| 2021 | 16.22 MWh | 7.79 MWh |
| 2022 | 15.21 MWh | 7.90 MWh |
| 2023 | 14.86 MWh | 7.99 MWh |
| 2024 | 15.26 MWh | 8.24 MWh |
| 2025 | 15.62 MWh | 8.17 MWh |
Finland history · Russia history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Finland vs Russia: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/finland-vs-russia/
World Power Monitor. Finland vs Russia: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/finland-vs-russia/
@misc{wpm_compare_finland_vs_russia_2025,
title = {{Finland vs Russia: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/finland-vs-russia/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/finland-vs-russia/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.