Brazil vs Indonesia: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Indonesia 528 TWh, according to Ember. Brazil's largest source was hydro (52.1%); Indonesia's was coal (69.4%). Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 705 gCO2/kWh in Indonesia. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Brazil is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.4 times as much as Indonesia in 2025 (764 TWh against 528 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 705 gCO2/kWh in Indonesia in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Coal supplied 69.4% of Indonesia's electricity in 2025, against 2.1% in Brazil.
- Indonesia's electricity was 6.5 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 705 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 15.8% of Indonesia's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 529 TWh in Indonesia.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | Indonesia |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 528 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 529 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | n/a |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 705 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 373 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 15.8% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Coal 69.4% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Brazil | Indonesia |
|---|---|---|
| Coal | 2.1% | 69.4% |
| Hydro | 52.1% | 6.7% |
| Wind | 15.2% | 0.1% |
| Gas | 7.8% | 11.6% |
| Solar | 11.5% | 0.3% |
| Bioenergy | 8.1% | 5.3% |
| Other renewables | 0.0% | 3.4% |
| Other fossil | 1.3% | 3.2% |
| Nuclear | 2.1% | 0.0% |
Carbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Indonesia |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 631 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 626 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 643 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 656 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 654 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 651 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 668 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 663 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 653 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 661 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 637 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 667 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 687 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 682 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 692 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 697 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 689 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 689 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 684 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 694 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 685 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 685 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 676 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 681 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 681 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 705 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Indonesia |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 0.45 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 0.49 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 0.51 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 0.52 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 0.55 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 0.58 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 0.59 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 0.63 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 0.65 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 0.67 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 0.72 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 0.77 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 0.83 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 0.88 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 0.92 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 0.93 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 0.98 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 1.00 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 1.06 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 1.09 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 1.07 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 1.12 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 1.20 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 1.25 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 1.31 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | n/a |
Brazil history · Indonesia history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs Indonesia: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-indonesia/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs Indonesia: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-indonesia/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_indonesia_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs Indonesia: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-indonesia/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-indonesia/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.