Brazil vs Russia: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Russia 1,194 TWh, according to Ember. Brazil's largest source was hydro (52.1%); Russia's was gas (45.6%). Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 447 gCO2/kWh in Russia. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Russia is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.6 times as much as Brazil in 2025 (1,194 TWh against 764 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 447 gCO2/kWh in Russia in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Gas supplied 45.6% of Russia's electricity in 2025, against 7.8% in Brazil.
- Russia's electricity was 4.1 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 447 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- Carbon intensity rose 7% in Russia between 2020 and 2025, while it fell 18% in Brazil.
- The average person in Russia used 8.17 MWh of electricity in 2025, 2.3 times as much as in Brazil (3.58 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 35.7% of Russia's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 1,178 TWh in Russia.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | Russia |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 1,194 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 1,178 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | 8.17 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 447 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 534 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 35.7% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Gas 45.6% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Russia |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 492 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | 492 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | 489 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 486 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 488 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | 496 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | 492 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 483 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 473 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 481 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 477 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | 482 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 477 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 482 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 468 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 470 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 458 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 463 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 465 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 454 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 457 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 463 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 458 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 475 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 452 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 458 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 461 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 462 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 450 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 449 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 444 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 443 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 440 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 439 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 440 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 418 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 427 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 443 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 447 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 444 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 447 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Russia |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 5.89 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 5.99 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 6.02 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 6.19 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 6.37 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 6.51 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 6.78 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 6.99 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 7.11 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 6.80 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 7.09 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 7.17 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 7.30 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 7.23 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 7.29 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 7.27 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 7.38 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 7.39 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 7.49 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 7.51 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 7.34 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 7.79 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 7.90 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 7.99 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 8.24 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | 8.17 MWh |
Brazil history · Russia history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs Russia: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-russia/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs Russia: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-russia/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_russia_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs Russia: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-russia/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-russia/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.