Brazil vs Colombia: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Colombia 90.4 TWh, according to Ember. Hydro was the largest source in both, at 52.1% in Brazil and 69.1% in Colombia. Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 186 gCO2/kWh in Colombia. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Brazil is the bigger electricity producer, generating 8.4 times as much as Colombia in 2025 (764 TWh against 90.4 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 186 gCO2/kWh in Colombia in 2025.
Why this comparison: neighbours by land border or interconnector and similar electricity demand on the same continent.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Hydro supplied 69.1% of Colombia's electricity in 2025, against 52.1% in Brazil.
- Colombia's electricity was 1.7 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 186 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- The average person in Brazil used 3.58 MWh of electricity in 2025, 2.1 times as much as in Colombia (1.72 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 77.0% of Colombia's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 90.7 TWh in Colombia.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | Colombia |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 90.4 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 90.7 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | 1.72 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 186 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 16.8 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 77.0% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Hydro 69.1% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Colombia |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 190 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 198 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 183 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 172 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 149 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 160 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 159 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 155 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 137 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 211 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 230 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 152 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 179 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 236 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 237 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 275 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 260 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 166 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 188 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 241 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 271 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 196 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 202 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 260 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 298 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 186 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Colombia |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 1.10 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 1.08 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 1.09 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 1.10 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 1.15 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 1.14 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 1.21 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 1.25 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 1.24 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 1.26 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 1.33 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 1.33 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 1.36 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 1.56 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 1.50 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 1.65 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 1.61 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 1.63 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 1.60 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 1.59 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 1.56 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 1.65 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 1.61 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 1.66 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 1.69 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | 1.72 MWh |
Brazil history · Colombia history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs Colombia: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-colombia/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs Colombia: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-colombia/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_colombia_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs Colombia: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-colombia/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-colombia/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.