Brazil vs United States: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and the United States 4,520 TWh, according to Ember. Brazil's largest source was hydro (52.1%); the United States' was gas (40.0%). Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 384 gCO2/kWh in the United States. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? The United States is the bigger electricity producer, generating 5.9 times as much as Brazil in 2025 (4,520 TWh against 764 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 384 gCO2/kWh in the United States in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Hydro supplied 52.1% of Brazil's electricity in 2025, against 5.4% in the United States.
- The United States' electricity was 3.5 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 384 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- The average person in the United States used 13.06 MWh of electricity in 2025, 3.6 times as much as in Brazil (3.58 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 43.0% of the United States'.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 4,532 TWh in the United States.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | United States |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 4,520 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 4,532 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | 13.06 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 384 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 1,737 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 43.0% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Gas 40.0% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Brazil | United States |
|---|---|---|
| Hydro | 52.1% | 5.4% |
| Gas | 7.8% | 40.0% |
| Nuclear | 2.1% | 17.4% |
| Coal | 2.1% | 16.3% |
| Wind | 15.2% | 10.3% |
| Solar | 11.5% | 8.6% |
| Bioenergy | 8.1% | 1.0% |
| Other fossil | 1.3% | 0.7% |
| Other renewables | 0.0% | 0.4% |
Carbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | United States |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 608 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 610 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 601 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 606 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 602 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 604 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 595 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 598 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 591 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 565 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 571 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 551 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 533 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 533 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 529 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 505 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 483 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 469 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 463 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 439 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 412 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 424 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 410 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 393 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 384 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 384 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | United States |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 13.63 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 13.19 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 13.46 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 13.37 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 13.54 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 13.73 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 13.61 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 13.83 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 13.58 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 12.90 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 13.31 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 13.14 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 12.89 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 12.85 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 12.84 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 12.73 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 12.62 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 12.37 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 12.67 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 12.43 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 12.05 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 12.33 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 12.67 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 12.44 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 12.75 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | 13.06 MWh |
Brazil history · United States history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs United States: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-united-states/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs United States: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-united-states/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_united_states_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs United States: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-united-states/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-united-states/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.