China vs Kazakhstan: Electricity Compared
China generated 10,506 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Kazakhstan 124 TWh, according to Ember. Coal was the largest source in both, at 54.8% in China and 58.3% in Kazakhstan. Each kWh generated emitted 528 gCO2/kWh in China and 813 gCO2/kWh in Kazakhstan. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? China is the bigger electricity producer, generating 84.5 times as much as Kazakhstan in 2025 (10,506 TWh against 124 TWh). China has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 528 gCO2/kWh against 813 gCO2/kWh in Kazakhstan in 2025.
Why this comparison: neighbours by land border or interconnector.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Gas supplied 27.1% of Kazakhstan's electricity in 2025, against 3.2% in China.
- Kazakhstan's electricity was 1.5 times as carbon intensive as China's in 2025, at 813 gCO2/kWh against 528 gCO2/kWh.
- Low carbon sources supplied 41.1% of China's electricity in 2025 and 14.2% of Kazakhstan's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 10,486 TWh in China and 126 TWh in Kazakhstan.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | China | Kazakhstan |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 10,506 TWh | 124 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 10,486 TWh | 126 TWh |
| Demand per person | 7.46 MWh | 6.05 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 528 gCO2/kWh | 813 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 5,550 MtCO2 | 101 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 41.1% | 14.2% |
| Largest source | Coal 54.8% | Coal 58.3% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | China | Kazakhstan |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 709 gCO2/kWh | 841 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 728 gCO2/kWh | 848 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 739 gCO2/kWh | 841 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 740 gCO2/kWh | 828 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 740 gCO2/kWh | 825 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 745 gCO2/kWh | 824 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 766 gCO2/kWh | 821 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 778 gCO2/kWh | 823 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 759 gCO2/kWh | 809 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 761 gCO2/kWh | 776 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 753 gCO2/kWh | 792 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 771 gCO2/kWh | 791 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 772 gCO2/kWh | 787 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 774 gCO2/kWh | 792 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 787 gCO2/kWh | 791 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 784 gCO2/kWh | 781 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 763 gCO2/kWh | 784 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 773 gCO2/kWh | 775 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 791 gCO2/kWh | 794 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 779 gCO2/kWh | 813 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 782 gCO2/kWh | 812 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 787 gCO2/kWh | 805 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 785 gCO2/kWh | 803 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 747 gCO2/kWh | 832 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 753 gCO2/kWh | 849 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 742 gCO2/kWh | 836 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 754 gCO2/kWh | 842 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 722 gCO2/kWh | 853 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 719 gCO2/kWh | 855 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 696 gCO2/kWh | 850 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 670 gCO2/kWh | 835 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 653 gCO2/kWh | 813 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 646 gCO2/kWh | 831 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 639 gCO2/kWh | 840 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 622 gCO2/kWh | 839 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 609 gCO2/kWh | 835 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 602 gCO2/kWh | 831 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 590 gCO2/kWh | 832 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 586 gCO2/kWh | 825 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 559 gCO2/kWh | 806 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 528 gCO2/kWh | 813 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | China | Kazakhstan |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 1.06 MWh | 3.53 MWh |
| 2001 | 1.15 MWh | 3.67 MWh |
| 2002 | 1.28 MWh | 3.75 MWh |
| 2003 | 1.47 MWh | 3.96 MWh |
| 2004 | 1.69 MWh | 4.09 MWh |
| 2005 | 1.90 MWh | 4.25 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.17 MWh | 4.46 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.47 MWh | 4.72 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.61 MWh | 4.91 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.76 MWh | 4.70 MWh |
| 2010 | 3.10 MWh | 4.98 MWh |
| 2011 | 3.46 MWh | 5.12 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.63 MWh | 5.31 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.93 MWh | 5.23 MWh |
| 2014 | 4.17 MWh | 5.25 MWh |
| 2015 | 4.16 MWh | 5.07 MWh |
| 2016 | 4.36 MWh | 5.09 MWh |
| 2017 | 4.67 MWh | 5.30 MWh |
| 2018 | 5.04 MWh | 5.48 MWh |
| 2019 | 5.26 MWh | 5.38 MWh |
| 2020 | 5.44 MWh | 5.54 MWh |
| 2021 | 5.97 MWh | 5.80 MWh |
| 2022 | 6.20 MWh | 5.74 MWh |
| 2023 | 6.64 MWh | 5.69 MWh |
| 2024 | 7.10 MWh | 5.87 MWh |
| 2025 | 7.46 MWh | 6.05 MWh |
China history · Kazakhstan history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). China vs Kazakhstan: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/china-vs-kazakhstan/
World Power Monitor. China vs Kazakhstan: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/china-vs-kazakhstan/
@misc{wpm_compare_china_vs_kazakhstan_2025,
title = {{China vs Kazakhstan: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/china-vs-kazakhstan/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/china-vs-kazakhstan/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.