China vs Pakistan: Electricity Compared
China generated 10,506 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Pakistan 171 TWh, according to Ember. China's largest source was coal (54.8%); Pakistan's was hydro (23.1%). Each kWh generated emitted 528 gCO2/kWh in China and 308 gCO2/kWh in Pakistan. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? China is the bigger electricity producer, generating 61.4 times as much as Pakistan in 2025 (10,506 TWh against 171 TWh). Pakistan has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 308 gCO2/kWh against 528 gCO2/kWh in China in 2025.
Why this comparison: neighbours by land border or interconnector.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Coal supplied 54.8% of China's electricity in 2025, against 14.5% in Pakistan.
- China's electricity was 1.7 times as carbon intensive as Pakistan's in 2025, at 528 gCO2/kWh against 308 gCO2/kWh.
- The average person in China used 7.46 MWh of electricity in 2025, 10.7 times as much as in Pakistan (0.70 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 41.1% of China's electricity in 2025 and 61.0% of Pakistan's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 10,486 TWh in China and 172 TWh in Pakistan.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | China | Pakistan |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 10,506 TWh | 171 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 10,486 TWh | 172 TWh |
| Demand per person | 7.46 MWh | 0.70 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 528 gCO2/kWh | 308 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 5,550 MtCO2 | 52.7 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 41.1% | 61.0% |
| Largest source | Coal 54.8% | Hydro 23.1% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | China | Pakistan |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 709 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1986 | 728 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1987 | 739 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1988 | 740 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1989 | 740 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1990 | 745 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1991 | 766 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1992 | 778 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1993 | 759 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1994 | 761 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1995 | 753 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1996 | 771 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1997 | 772 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1998 | 774 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1999 | 787 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 2000 | 784 gCO2/kWh | 500 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 763 gCO2/kWh | 484 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 773 gCO2/kWh | 466 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 791 gCO2/kWh | 442 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 779 gCO2/kWh | 462 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 782 gCO2/kWh | 442 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 787 gCO2/kWh | 443 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 785 gCO2/kWh | 457 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 747 gCO2/kWh | 459 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 753 gCO2/kWh | 458 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 742 gCO2/kWh | 430 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 754 gCO2/kWh | 443 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 722 gCO2/kWh | 432 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 719 gCO2/kWh | 436 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 696 gCO2/kWh | 433 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 670 gCO2/kWh | 432 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 653 gCO2/kWh | 457 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 646 gCO2/kWh | 486 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 639 gCO2/kWh | 485 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 622 gCO2/kWh | 469 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 609 gCO2/kWh | 464 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 602 gCO2/kWh | 453 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 590 gCO2/kWh | 401 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 586 gCO2/kWh | 365 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 559 gCO2/kWh | 334 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 528 gCO2/kWh | 308 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | China | Pakistan |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 1.06 MWh | 0.43 MWh |
| 2001 | 1.15 MWh | 0.45 MWh |
| 2002 | 1.28 MWh | 0.46 MWh |
| 2003 | 1.47 MWh | 0.49 MWh |
| 2004 | 1.69 MWh | 0.50 MWh |
| 2005 | 1.90 MWh | 0.54 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.17 MWh | 0.56 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.47 MWh | 0.52 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.61 MWh | 0.49 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.76 MWh | 0.50 MWh |
| 2010 | 3.10 MWh | 0.48 MWh |
| 2011 | 3.46 MWh | 0.47 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.63 MWh | 0.47 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.93 MWh | 0.50 MWh |
| 2014 | 4.17 MWh | 0.51 MWh |
| 2015 | 4.16 MWh | 0.52 MWh |
| 2016 | 4.36 MWh | 0.56 MWh |
| 2017 | 4.67 MWh | 0.59 MWh |
| 2018 | 5.04 MWh | 0.57 MWh |
| 2019 | 5.26 MWh | 0.59 MWh |
| 2020 | 5.44 MWh | 0.58 MWh |
| 2021 | 5.97 MWh | 0.62 MWh |
| 2022 | 6.20 MWh | 0.63 MWh |
| 2023 | 6.64 MWh | 0.60 MWh |
| 2024 | 7.10 MWh | 0.63 MWh |
| 2025 | 7.46 MWh | 0.70 MWh |
China history · Pakistan history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). China vs Pakistan: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/china-vs-pakistan/
World Power Monitor. China vs Pakistan: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/china-vs-pakistan/
@misc{wpm_compare_china_vs_pakistan_2025,
title = {{China vs Pakistan: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/china-vs-pakistan/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/china-vs-pakistan/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.