Brazil vs United Kingdom: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and the United Kingdom 294 TWh, according to Ember. Brazil's largest source was hydro (52.1%); the United Kingdom's was gas (31.3%). Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 218 gCO2/kWh in the United Kingdom. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Brazil is the bigger electricity producer, generating 2.6 times as much as the United Kingdom in 2025 (764 TWh against 294 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 218 gCO2/kWh in the United Kingdom in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Hydro supplied 52.1% of Brazil's electricity in 2025, against 1.8% in the United Kingdom.
- The United Kingdom's electricity was 2.0 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 218 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- Electricity demand rose 19% in Brazil between 2020 and 2025, while it fell 4% in the United Kingdom.
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 64.2% of the United Kingdom's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 312 TWh in the United Kingdom.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | United Kingdom |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 294 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 312 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | 4.62 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 218 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 64.0 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 64.2% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Gas 31.3% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | United Kingdom |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 694 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | 721 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | 737 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 710 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 689 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | 705 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | 700 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 665 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 608 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 589 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 579 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | 557 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 512 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 510 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 492 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 522 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 529 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 521 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 537 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 536 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 535 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 559 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 556 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 554 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 505 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 517 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 500 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 537 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 507 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 463 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 398 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 333 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 302 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 286 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 268 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 243 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 267 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 255 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 236 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 216 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 218 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | United Kingdom |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 6.63 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 6.67 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 6.65 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 6.69 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 6.67 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 6.71 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 6.63 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 6.53 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 6.45 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 6.07 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 6.11 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 5.89 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 5.87 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 5.79 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 5.53 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 5.51 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 5.42 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 5.32 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 5.29 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 5.19 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 4.88 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 4.92 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 4.70 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 4.60 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 4.59 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | 4.62 MWh |
Brazil history · United Kingdom history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs United Kingdom: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-united-kingdom/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs United Kingdom: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-united-kingdom/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_united_kingdom_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs United Kingdom: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-united-kingdom/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-united-kingdom/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.