Brazil vs Canada: Electricity Compared
Brazil generated 764 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Canada 660 TWh, according to Ember. Hydro was the largest source in both, at 52.1% in Brazil and 52.8% in Canada. Each kWh generated emitted 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil and 192 gCO2/kWh in Canada. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Brazil is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.2 times as much as Canada in 2025 (764 TWh against 660 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 192 gCO2/kWh in Canada in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Canada's electricity was 1.8 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 192 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- Carbon intensity rose 18% in Canada between 2020 and 2025, while it fell 18% in Brazil.
- The average person in Canada used 16.09 MWh of electricity in 2025, 4.5 times as much as in Brazil (3.58 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 88.9% of Brazil's electricity in 2025 and 76.5% of Canada's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 775 TWh in Brazil and 654 TWh in Canada.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Brazil | Canada |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 764 TWh | 660 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 775 TWh | 654 TWh |
| Demand per person | 3.58 MWh | 16.09 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 109 gCO2/kWh | 192 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 83.4 MtCO2 | 126 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 88.9% | 76.5% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.1% | Hydro 52.8% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Canada |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 191 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 85 gCO2/kWh | 172 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 74 gCO2/kWh | 190 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 206 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 66 gCO2/kWh | 225 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 60 gCO2/kWh | 206 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 62 gCO2/kWh | 202 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 209 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 191 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 61 gCO2/kWh | 188 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 63 gCO2/kWh | 199 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 68 gCO2/kWh | 192 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 213 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 71 gCO2/kWh | 241 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 235 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 89 gCO2/kWh | 246 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 256 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 97 gCO2/kWh | 245 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 252 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 102 gCO2/kWh | 235 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 99 gCO2/kWh | 225 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 217 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 91 gCO2/kWh | 228 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 214 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 87 gCO2/kWh | 204 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 114 gCO2/kWh | 215 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 100 gCO2/kWh | 206 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 128 gCO2/kWh | 193 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 187 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 189 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 184 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 150 gCO2/kWh | 181 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 156 gCO2/kWh | 172 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 137 gCO2/kWh | 171 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 142 gCO2/kWh | 170 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 133 gCO2/kWh | 162 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 168 gCO2/kWh | 165 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 161 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 96 gCO2/kWh | 174 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 185 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 109 gCO2/kWh | 192 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Brazil | Canada |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.25 MWh | 18.39 MWh |
| 2001 | 2.08 MWh | 18.12 MWh |
| 2002 | 2.14 MWh | 18.34 MWh |
| 2003 | 2.23 MWh | 18.30 MWh |
| 2004 | 2.33 MWh | 18.30 MWh |
| 2005 | 2.39 MWh | 18.39 MWh |
| 2006 | 2.47 MWh | 17.99 MWh |
| 2007 | 2.57 MWh | 18.23 MWh |
| 2008 | 2.66 MWh | 18.03 MWh |
| 2009 | 2.64 MWh | 17.15 MWh |
| 2010 | 2.84 MWh | 17.02 MWh |
| 2011 | 2.91 MWh | 17.41 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.01 MWh | 16.89 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.08 MWh | 17.11 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.12 MWh | 17.04 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.05 MWh | 16.73 MWh |
| 2016 | 3.05 MWh | 16.60 MWh |
| 2017 | 3.06 MWh | 16.49 MWh |
| 2018 | 3.09 MWh | 16.44 MWh |
| 2019 | 3.17 MWh | 16.11 MWh |
| 2020 | 3.13 MWh | 15.67 MWh |
| 2021 | 3.24 MWh | 15.74 MWh |
| 2022 | 3.28 MWh | 15.79 MWh |
| 2023 | 3.43 MWh | 15.61 MWh |
| 2024 | 3.57 MWh | 15.71 MWh |
| 2025 | 3.58 MWh | 16.09 MWh |
Brazil history · Canada history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Brazil vs Canada: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-canada/
World Power Monitor. Brazil vs Canada: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-canada/
@misc{wpm_compare_brazil_vs_canada_2025,
title = {{Brazil vs Canada: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-canada/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/brazil-vs-canada/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.