Lithuania vs Sweden: Electricity Compared
Lithuania generated 8.85 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Sweden 170 TWh, according to Ember. Lithuania's largest source was wind (45.0%); Sweden's was hydro (40.1%). Each kWh generated emitted 138 gCO2/kWh in Lithuania and 35 gCO2/kWh in Sweden. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Sweden is the bigger electricity producer, generating 19.2 times as much as Lithuania in 2025 (170 TWh against 8.85 TWh). Sweden has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 35 gCO2/kWh against 138 gCO2/kWh in Lithuania in 2025.
Why this comparison: neighbours by land border or interconnector.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Hydro supplied 40.1% of Sweden's electricity in 2025, against 3.9% in Lithuania.
- Lithuania's electricity was 3.9 times as carbon intensive as Sweden's in 2025, at 138 gCO2/kWh against 35 gCO2/kWh.
- The average person in Sweden used 12.83 MWh of electricity in 2025, 2.9 times as much as in Lithuania (4.41 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 77.7% of Lithuania's electricity in 2025 and 98.8% of Sweden's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 12.5 TWh in Lithuania and 137 TWh in Sweden.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Lithuania | Sweden |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 8.85 TWh | 170 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 12.5 TWh | 137 TWh |
| Demand per person | 4.41 MWh | 12.83 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 138 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 1.22 MtCO2 | 6.02 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 77.7% | 98.8% |
| Largest source | Wind 45.0% | Hydro 40.1% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Lithuania | Sweden |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 191 gCO2/kWh | 33 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 213 gCO2/kWh | 41 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 113 gCO2/kWh | 46 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 60 gCO2/kWh | 51 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 57 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 65 gCO2/kWh | 54 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 73 gCO2/kWh | 79 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 52 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 122 gCO2/kWh | 49 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 124 gCO2/kWh | 50 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 104 gCO2/kWh | 45 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 47 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 77 gCO2/kWh | 56 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 72 gCO2/kWh | 69 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 77 gCO2/kWh | 48 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 111 gCO2/kWh | 43 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 111 gCO2/kWh | 50 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 104 gCO2/kWh | 46 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 48 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 51 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 369 gCO2/kWh | 64 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 323 gCO2/kWh | 52 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 321 gCO2/kWh | 45 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 294 gCO2/kWh | 45 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 285 gCO2/kWh | 40 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 294 gCO2/kWh | 41 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 235 gCO2/kWh | 43 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 183 gCO2/kWh | 42 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 180 gCO2/kWh | 43 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 172 gCO2/kWh | 42 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 231 gCO2/kWh | 39 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 220 gCO2/kWh | 42 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 180 gCO2/kWh | 41 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 121 gCO2/kWh | 38 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 116 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 138 gCO2/kWh | 35 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1990 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Lithuania | Sweden |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.80 MWh | 16.90 MWh |
| 2001 | 3.00 MWh | 17.35 MWh |
| 2002 | 3.14 MWh | 17.04 MWh |
| 2003 | 3.31 MWh | 16.55 MWh |
| 2004 | 3.42 MWh | 16.62 MWh |
| 2005 | 3.45 MWh | 16.72 MWh |
| 2006 | 3.56 MWh | 16.44 MWh |
| 2007 | 3.74 MWh | 16.41 MWh |
| 2008 | 3.87 MWh | 16.05 MWh |
| 2009 | 3.70 MWh | 15.20 MWh |
| 2010 | 3.55 MWh | 16.05 MWh |
| 2011 | 3.63 MWh | 15.14 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.72 MWh | 15.43 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.77 MWh | 14.90 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.86 MWh | 14.23 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.94 MWh | 14.23 MWh |
| 2016 | 4.15 MWh | 14.53 MWh |
| 2017 | 4.33 MWh | 14.44 MWh |
| 2018 | 4.48 MWh | 14.36 MWh |
| 2019 | 4.54 MWh | 13.84 MWh |
| 2020 | 4.51 MWh | 13.40 MWh |
| 2021 | 4.77 MWh | 14.04 MWh |
| 2022 | 4.48 MWh | 13.33 MWh |
| 2023 | 4.29 MWh | 13.04 MWh |
| 2024 | 4.47 MWh | 13.08 MWh |
| 2025 | 4.41 MWh | 12.83 MWh |
Lithuania history · Sweden history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Lithuania vs Sweden: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/lithuania-vs-sweden/
World Power Monitor. Lithuania vs Sweden: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/lithuania-vs-sweden/
@misc{wpm_compare_lithuania_vs_sweden_2025,
title = {{Lithuania vs Sweden: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/lithuania-vs-sweden/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/lithuania-vs-sweden/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.