Lithuania vs Russia: Electricity Compared
Lithuania generated 8.85 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Russia 1,194 TWh, according to Ember. Lithuania's largest source was wind (45.0%); Russia's was gas (45.6%). Each kWh generated emitted 138 gCO2/kWh in Lithuania and 447 gCO2/kWh in Russia. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Russia is the bigger electricity producer, generating 135.0 times as much as Lithuania in 2025 (1,194 TWh against 8.85 TWh). Lithuania has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 138 gCO2/kWh against 447 gCO2/kWh in Russia in 2025.
Why this comparison: neighbours by land border or interconnector.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Wind supplied 45.0% of Lithuania's electricity in 2025, against 0.3% in Russia.
- Russia's electricity was 3.2 times as carbon intensive as Lithuania's in 2025, at 447 gCO2/kWh against 138 gCO2/kWh.
- Carbon intensity rose 7% in Russia between 2020 and 2025, while it fell 40% in Lithuania.
- Low carbon sources supplied 77.7% of Lithuania's electricity in 2025 and 35.7% of Russia's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 12.5 TWh in Lithuania and 1,178 TWh in Russia.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Lithuania | Russia |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 8.85 TWh | 1,194 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 12.5 TWh | 1,178 TWh |
| Demand per person | 4.41 MWh | 8.17 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 138 gCO2/kWh | 447 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 1.22 MtCO2 | 534 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 77.7% | 35.7% |
| Largest source | Wind 45.0% | Gas 45.6% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Lithuania | Russia |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | 492 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | n/a | 492 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | n/a | 489 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | n/a | 486 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | n/a | 488 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 191 gCO2/kWh | 496 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 213 gCO2/kWh | 492 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 113 gCO2/kWh | 483 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 60 gCO2/kWh | 473 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 481 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 65 gCO2/kWh | 477 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 73 gCO2/kWh | 482 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 477 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 122 gCO2/kWh | 482 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 124 gCO2/kWh | 468 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 104 gCO2/kWh | 470 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 90 gCO2/kWh | 458 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 77 gCO2/kWh | 463 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 72 gCO2/kWh | 465 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 77 gCO2/kWh | 454 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 111 gCO2/kWh | 457 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 111 gCO2/kWh | 463 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 104 gCO2/kWh | 458 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 103 gCO2/kWh | 475 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 106 gCO2/kWh | 452 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 369 gCO2/kWh | 458 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 323 gCO2/kWh | 461 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 321 gCO2/kWh | 462 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 294 gCO2/kWh | 450 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 285 gCO2/kWh | 449 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 294 gCO2/kWh | 444 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 235 gCO2/kWh | 443 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 183 gCO2/kWh | 440 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 180 gCO2/kWh | 439 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 172 gCO2/kWh | 440 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 231 gCO2/kWh | 418 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 220 gCO2/kWh | 427 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 180 gCO2/kWh | 443 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 121 gCO2/kWh | 447 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 116 gCO2/kWh | 444 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 138 gCO2/kWh | 447 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Lithuania | Russia |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 2.80 MWh | 5.89 MWh |
| 2001 | 3.00 MWh | 5.99 MWh |
| 2002 | 3.14 MWh | 6.02 MWh |
| 2003 | 3.31 MWh | 6.19 MWh |
| 2004 | 3.42 MWh | 6.37 MWh |
| 2005 | 3.45 MWh | 6.51 MWh |
| 2006 | 3.56 MWh | 6.78 MWh |
| 2007 | 3.74 MWh | 6.99 MWh |
| 2008 | 3.87 MWh | 7.11 MWh |
| 2009 | 3.70 MWh | 6.80 MWh |
| 2010 | 3.55 MWh | 7.09 MWh |
| 2011 | 3.63 MWh | 7.17 MWh |
| 2012 | 3.72 MWh | 7.30 MWh |
| 2013 | 3.77 MWh | 7.23 MWh |
| 2014 | 3.86 MWh | 7.29 MWh |
| 2015 | 3.94 MWh | 7.27 MWh |
| 2016 | 4.15 MWh | 7.38 MWh |
| 2017 | 4.33 MWh | 7.39 MWh |
| 2018 | 4.48 MWh | 7.49 MWh |
| 2019 | 4.54 MWh | 7.51 MWh |
| 2020 | 4.51 MWh | 7.34 MWh |
| 2021 | 4.77 MWh | 7.79 MWh |
| 2022 | 4.48 MWh | 7.90 MWh |
| 2023 | 4.29 MWh | 7.99 MWh |
| 2024 | 4.47 MWh | 8.24 MWh |
| 2025 | 4.41 MWh | 8.17 MWh |
Lithuania history · Russia history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Lithuania vs Russia: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/lithuania-vs-russia/
World Power Monitor. Lithuania vs Russia: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/lithuania-vs-russia/
@misc{wpm_compare_lithuania_vs_russia_2025,
title = {{Lithuania vs Russia: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/lithuania-vs-russia/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/lithuania-vs-russia/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.