Germany vs South Korea: Electricity Compared
Germany generated 497 TWh of electricity in 2025 and South Korea 628 TWh, according to Ember. Germany's largest source was wind (26.6%); South Korea's was coal (31.1%). Each kWh generated emitted 334 gCO2/kWh in Germany and 418 gCO2/kWh in South Korea. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? South Korea is the bigger electricity producer, generating 1.3 times as much as Germany in 2025 (628 TWh against 497 TWh). Germany has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 334 gCO2/kWh against 418 gCO2/kWh in South Korea in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Nuclear supplied 29.4% of South Korea's electricity in 2025, against none in Germany.
- Electricity demand rose 9% in South Korea between 2020 and 2025, while it fell 6% in Germany.
- Low carbon sources supplied 58.5% of Germany's electricity in 2025 and 39.9% of South Korea's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 517 TWh in Germany and 628 TWh in South Korea.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Germany | South Korea |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 497 TWh | 628 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 517 TWh | 628 TWh |
| Demand per person | 6.19 MWh | 12.09 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 334 gCO2/kWh | 418 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 166 MtCO2 | 262 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 58.5% | 39.9% |
| Largest source | Wind 26.6% | Coal 31.1% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Germany | South Korea |
|---|---|---|
| Coal | 21.0% | 31.1% |
| Nuclear | 0.0% | 29.4% |
| Gas | 16.8% | 28.0% |
| Wind | 26.6% | 0.6% |
| Solar | 18.1% | 6.0% |
| Bioenergy | 10.1% | 3.2% |
| Other fossil | 3.8% | 1.0% |
| Hydro | 3.7% | 0.6% |
| Other renewables | 0.1% | 0.0% |
Carbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Germany | South Korea |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 431 gCO2/kWh | 524 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 431 gCO2/kWh | 431 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 431 gCO2/kWh | 345 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 431 gCO2/kWh | 405 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 431 gCO2/kWh | 383 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 622 gCO2/kWh | 379 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 628 gCO2/kWh | 399 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 605 gCO2/kWh | 427 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 608 gCO2/kWh | 451 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 604 gCO2/kWh | 493 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 596 gCO2/kWh | 479 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 591 gCO2/kWh | 481 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 575 gCO2/kWh | 492 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 587 gCO2/kWh | 463 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 566 gCO2/kWh | 453 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 573 gCO2/kWh | 462 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 565 gCO2/kWh | 475 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 570 gCO2/kWh | 473 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 570 gCO2/kWh | 458 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 555 gCO2/kWh | 463 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 546 gCO2/kWh | 450 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 536 gCO2/kWh | 451 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 552 gCO2/kWh | 474 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 525 gCO2/kWh | 477 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 522 gCO2/kWh | 495 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 517 gCO2/kWh | 500 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 530 gCO2/kWh | 497 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 534 gCO2/kWh | 502 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 538 gCO2/kWh | 512 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 522 gCO2/kWh | 493 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 504 gCO2/kWh | 488 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 498 gCO2/kWh | 489 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 470 gCO2/kWh | 511 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 455 gCO2/kWh | 519 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 392 gCO2/kWh | 497 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 356 gCO2/kWh | 458 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 395 gCO2/kWh | 460 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 420 gCO2/kWh | 438 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 364 gCO2/kWh | 427 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 340 gCO2/kWh | 416 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 334 gCO2/kWh | 418 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Germany | South Korea |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 6.99 MWh | 6.21 MWh |
| 2001 | 7.11 MWh | 6.59 MWh |
| 2002 | 7.24 MWh | 7.02 MWh |
| 2003 | 7.29 MWh | 7.32 MWh |
| 2004 | 7.39 MWh | 7.72 MWh |
| 2005 | 7.42 MWh | 8.14 MWh |
| 2006 | 7.51 MWh | 8.39 MWh |
| 2007 | 7.56 MWh | 8.83 MWh |
| 2008 | 7.55 MWh | 9.15 MWh |
| 2009 | 7.11 MWh | 9.32 MWh |
| 2010 | 7.54 MWh | 10.15 MWh |
| 2011 | 7.44 MWh | 10.55 MWh |
| 2012 | 7.41 MWh | 10.71 MWh |
| 2013 | 7.37 MWh | 10.73 MWh |
| 2014 | 7.19 MWh | 10.69 MWh |
| 2015 | 7.20 MWh | 10.75 MWh |
| 2016 | 7.14 MWh | 10.94 MWh |
| 2017 | 7.12 MWh | 11.20 MWh |
| 2018 | 7.00 MWh | 11.48 MWh |
| 2019 | 6.79 MWh | 11.34 MWh |
| 2020 | 6.55 MWh | 11.13 MWh |
| 2021 | 6.69 MWh | 11.72 MWh |
| 2022 | 6.42 MWh | 12.02 MWh |
| 2023 | 6.10 MWh | 11.93 MWh |
| 2024 | 6.18 MWh | 12.09 MWh |
| 2025 | 6.19 MWh | 12.09 MWh |
Germany history · South Korea history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Germany vs South Korea: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/germany-vs-south-korea/
World Power Monitor. Germany vs South Korea: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/germany-vs-south-korea/
@misc{wpm_compare_germany_vs_south_korea_2025,
title = {{Germany vs South Korea: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/germany-vs-south-korea/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/germany-vs-south-korea/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.