Canada vs Italy: Electricity Compared
Canada generated 660 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Italy 265 TWh, according to Ember. Canada's largest source was hydro (52.8%); Italy's was gas (47.4%). Each kWh generated emitted 192 gCO2/kWh in Canada and 285 gCO2/kWh in Italy. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Canada is the bigger electricity producer, generating 2.5 times as much as Italy in 2025 (660 TWh against 265 TWh). Canada has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 192 gCO2/kWh against 285 gCO2/kWh in Italy in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Hydro supplied 52.8% of Canada's electricity in 2025, against 15.7% in Italy.
- Carbon intensity rose 18% in Canada between 2020 and 2025, while it fell 15% in Italy.
- The average person in Canada used 16.09 MWh of electricity in 2025, 3.1 times as much as in Italy (5.27 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 76.5% of Canada's electricity in 2025 and 48.7% of Italy's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 654 TWh in Canada and 312 TWh in Italy.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Canada | Italy |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 660 TWh | 265 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 654 TWh | 312 TWh |
| Demand per person | 16.09 MWh | 5.27 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 192 gCO2/kWh | 285 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 126 MtCO2 | 75.6 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 76.5% | 48.7% |
| Largest source | Hydro 52.8% | Gas 47.4% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generation| Source | Canada | Italy |
|---|---|---|
| Hydro | 52.8% | 15.7% |
| Gas | 19.7% | 47.4% |
| Solar | 1.4% | 16.8% |
| Nuclear | 12.9% | 0.0% |
| Wind | 8.0% | 8.1% |
| Bioenergy | 1.5% | 5.9% |
| Coal | 2.7% | 1.4% |
| Other fossil | 1.2% | 2.6% |
| Other renewables | 0.0% | 2.1% |
Carbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Canada | Italy |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 191 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1986 | 172 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1987 | 190 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1988 | 206 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1989 | 225 gCO2/kWh | n/a |
| 1990 | 206 gCO2/kWh | 564 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 202 gCO2/kWh | 534 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 209 gCO2/kWh | 527 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 191 gCO2/kWh | 518 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 188 gCO2/kWh | 518 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 199 gCO2/kWh | 542 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 192 gCO2/kWh | 525 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 213 gCO2/kWh | 520 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 241 gCO2/kWh | 520 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 235 gCO2/kWh | 501 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 246 gCO2/kWh | 502 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 256 gCO2/kWh | 499 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 245 gCO2/kWh | 523 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 252 gCO2/kWh | 523 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 235 gCO2/kWh | 511 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 225 gCO2/kWh | 510 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 217 gCO2/kWh | 507 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 228 gCO2/kWh | 505 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 214 gCO2/kWh | 485 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 204 gCO2/kWh | 459 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 215 gCO2/kWh | 446 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 206 gCO2/kWh | 446 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 193 gCO2/kWh | 438 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 187 gCO2/kWh | 399 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 189 gCO2/kWh | 379 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 184 gCO2/kWh | 399 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 181 gCO2/kWh | 390 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 172 gCO2/kWh | 393 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 171 gCO2/kWh | 367 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 170 gCO2/kWh | 351 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 162 gCO2/kWh | 334 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 165 gCO2/kWh | 339 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 161 gCO2/kWh | 378 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 174 gCO2/kWh | 323 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 185 gCO2/kWh | 281 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 192 gCO2/kWh | 285 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Canada | Italy |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 18.39 MWh | 5.49 MWh |
| 2001 | 18.12 MWh | 5.59 MWh |
| 2002 | 18.34 MWh | 5.71 MWh |
| 2003 | 18.30 MWh | 5.84 MWh |
| 2004 | 18.30 MWh | 5.83 MWh |
| 2005 | 18.39 MWh | 5.88 MWh |
| 2006 | 17.99 MWh | 5.97 MWh |
| 2007 | 18.23 MWh | 5.96 MWh |
| 2008 | 18.03 MWh | 5.90 MWh |
| 2009 | 17.15 MWh | 5.53 MWh |
| 2010 | 17.02 MWh | 5.66 MWh |
| 2011 | 17.41 MWh | 5.70 MWh |
| 2012 | 16.89 MWh | 5.59 MWh |
| 2013 | 17.11 MWh | 5.41 MWh |
| 2014 | 17.04 MWh | 5.28 MWh |
| 2015 | 16.73 MWh | 5.38 MWh |
| 2016 | 16.60 MWh | 5.34 MWh |
| 2017 | 16.49 MWh | 5.46 MWh |
| 2018 | 16.44 MWh | 5.47 MWh |
| 2019 | 16.11 MWh | 5.46 MWh |
| 2020 | 15.67 MWh | 5.16 MWh |
| 2021 | 15.74 MWh | 5.50 MWh |
| 2022 | 15.79 MWh | 5.42 MWh |
| 2023 | 15.61 MWh | 5.26 MWh |
| 2024 | 15.71 MWh | 5.37 MWh |
| 2025 | 16.09 MWh | 5.27 MWh |
Canada history · Italy history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Canada vs Italy: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/canada-vs-italy/
World Power Monitor. Canada vs Italy: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/canada-vs-italy/
@misc{wpm_compare_canada_vs_italy_2025,
title = {{Canada vs Italy: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/canada-vs-italy/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/canada-vs-italy/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.