Australia vs Brazil: Electricity Compared
Australia generated 286 TWh of electricity in 2025 and Brazil 764 TWh, according to Ember. Australia's largest source was coal (42.9%); Brazil's was hydro (52.1%). Each kWh generated emitted 518 gCO2/kWh in Australia and 109 gCO2/kWh in Brazil. These are Ember annual statistics for 2025, compiled from national sources; they are not real time.
Who is bigger and who is cleaner? Brazil is the bigger electricity producer, generating 2.7 times as much as Australia in 2025 (764 TWh against 286 TWh). Brazil has the cleaner electricity by carbon intensity, at 109 gCO2/kWh against 518 gCO2/kWh in Australia in 2025.
Why this comparison: both among the 20 largest electricity users.
Open this comparison in the interactive tool to add more countries or change the metric.
Key Facts
- Hydro supplied 52.1% of Brazil's electricity in 2025, against 4.4% in Australia.
- Australia's electricity was 4.7 times as carbon intensive as Brazil's in 2025, at 518 gCO2/kWh against 109 gCO2/kWh.
- The average person in Australia used 10.63 MWh of electricity in 2025, 3.0 times as much as in Brazil (3.58 MWh).
- Low carbon sources supplied 39.8% of Australia's electricity in 2025 and 88.9% of Brazil's.
- Electricity demand in 2025 was 286 TWh in Australia and 775 TWh in Brazil.
Key Figures, 2025
Ember annual statistics| Measure | Australia | Brazil |
|---|---|---|
| Total generation | 286 TWh | 764 TWh |
| Electricity demand | 286 TWh | 775 TWh |
| Demand per person | 10.63 MWh | 3.58 MWh |
| Carbon intensity | 518 gCO2/kWh | 109 gCO2/kWh |
| Power sector emissions | 148 MtCO2 | 83.4 MtCO2 |
| Low carbon share | 39.8% | 88.9% |
| Largest source | Coal 42.9% | Hydro 52.1% |
Generation Mix, 2025
Share of generationCarbon Intensity, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Australia | Brazil |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | 759 gCO2/kWh | 61 gCO2/kWh |
| 1986 | 761 gCO2/kWh | 85 gCO2/kWh |
| 1987 | 772 gCO2/kWh | 74 gCO2/kWh |
| 1988 | 771 gCO2/kWh | 66 gCO2/kWh |
| 1989 | 777 gCO2/kWh | 66 gCO2/kWh |
| 1990 | 786 gCO2/kWh | 60 gCO2/kWh |
| 1991 | 785 gCO2/kWh | 62 gCO2/kWh |
| 1992 | 786 gCO2/kWh | 63 gCO2/kWh |
| 1993 | 786 gCO2/kWh | 61 gCO2/kWh |
| 1994 | 788 gCO2/kWh | 61 gCO2/kWh |
| 1995 | 793 gCO2/kWh | 63 gCO2/kWh |
| 1996 | 795 gCO2/kWh | 68 gCO2/kWh |
| 1997 | 800 gCO2/kWh | 71 gCO2/kWh |
| 1998 | 804 gCO2/kWh | 71 gCO2/kWh |
| 1999 | 803 gCO2/kWh | 90 gCO2/kWh |
| 2000 | 806 gCO2/kWh | 89 gCO2/kWh |
| 2001 | 803 gCO2/kWh | 106 gCO2/kWh |
| 2002 | 795 gCO2/kWh | 97 gCO2/kWh |
| 2003 | 792 gCO2/kWh | 91 gCO2/kWh |
| 2004 | 793 gCO2/kWh | 102 gCO2/kWh |
| 2005 | 792 gCO2/kWh | 99 gCO2/kWh |
| 2006 | 791 gCO2/kWh | 96 gCO2/kWh |
| 2007 | 791 gCO2/kWh | 91 gCO2/kWh |
| 2008 | 792 gCO2/kWh | 114 gCO2/kWh |
| 2009 | 785 gCO2/kWh | 87 gCO2/kWh |
| 2010 | 776 gCO2/kWh | 114 gCO2/kWh |
| 2011 | 749 gCO2/kWh | 100 gCO2/kWh |
| 2012 | 747 gCO2/kWh | 128 gCO2/kWh |
| 2013 | 726 gCO2/kWh | 168 gCO2/kWh |
| 2014 | 734 gCO2/kWh | 193 gCO2/kWh |
| 2015 | 730 gCO2/kWh | 189 gCO2/kWh |
| 2016 | 714 gCO2/kWh | 150 gCO2/kWh |
| 2017 | 718 gCO2/kWh | 156 gCO2/kWh |
| 2018 | 689 gCO2/kWh | 137 gCO2/kWh |
| 2019 | 670 gCO2/kWh | 142 gCO2/kWh |
| 2020 | 642 gCO2/kWh | 133 gCO2/kWh |
| 2021 | 606 gCO2/kWh | 168 gCO2/kWh |
| 2022 | 578 gCO2/kWh | 103 gCO2/kWh |
| 2023 | 557 gCO2/kWh | 96 gCO2/kWh |
| 2024 | 554 gCO2/kWh | 106 gCO2/kWh |
| 2025 | 518 gCO2/kWh | 109 gCO2/kWh |
Demand per Person, 1985 to 2025
Ember annual statistics| Year | Australia | Brazil |
|---|---|---|
| 1985 | n/a | n/a |
| 1986 | n/a | n/a |
| 1987 | n/a | n/a |
| 1988 | n/a | n/a |
| 1989 | n/a | n/a |
| 1990 | n/a | n/a |
| 1991 | n/a | n/a |
| 1992 | n/a | n/a |
| 1993 | n/a | n/a |
| 1994 | n/a | n/a |
| 1995 | n/a | n/a |
| 1996 | n/a | n/a |
| 1997 | n/a | n/a |
| 1998 | n/a | n/a |
| 1999 | n/a | n/a |
| 2000 | 11.33 MWh | 2.25 MWh |
| 2001 | 11.58 MWh | 2.08 MWh |
| 2002 | 11.41 MWh | 2.14 MWh |
| 2003 | 11.40 MWh | 2.23 MWh |
| 2004 | 11.44 MWh | 2.33 MWh |
| 2005 | 11.37 MWh | 2.39 MWh |
| 2006 | 11.56 MWh | 2.47 MWh |
| 2007 | 11.61 MWh | 2.57 MWh |
| 2008 | 11.48 MWh | 2.66 MWh |
| 2009 | 11.47 MWh | 2.64 MWh |
| 2010 | 11.34 MWh | 2.84 MWh |
| 2011 | 11.40 MWh | 2.91 MWh |
| 2012 | 10.97 MWh | 3.01 MWh |
| 2013 | 10.74 MWh | 3.08 MWh |
| 2014 | 10.50 MWh | 3.12 MWh |
| 2015 | 10.61 MWh | 3.05 MWh |
| 2016 | 10.61 MWh | 3.05 MWh |
| 2017 | 10.47 MWh | 3.06 MWh |
| 2018 | 10.46 MWh | 3.09 MWh |
| 2019 | 10.44 MWh | 3.17 MWh |
| 2020 | 10.30 MWh | 3.13 MWh |
| 2021 | 10.30 MWh | 3.24 MWh |
| 2022 | 10.42 MWh | 3.28 MWh |
| 2023 | 10.33 MWh | 3.43 MWh |
| 2024 | 10.54 MWh | 3.57 MWh |
| 2025 | 10.63 MWh | 3.58 MWh |
Australia history · Brazil history
Source: Ember (ember-energy.org), licensed under CC BY 4.0. Data as of 2025.
Related
Cite this page
World Power Monitor. (2025). Australia vs Brazil: Electricity Compared. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/australia-vs-brazil/
World Power Monitor. Australia vs Brazil: Electricity Compared. Data as of 2025. Data from Ember. https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/australia-vs-brazil/
@misc{wpm_compare_australia_vs_brazil_2025,
title = {{Australia vs Brazil: Electricity Compared}},
author = {{World Power Monitor}},
year = {2025},
note = {Data as of 2025. Data from Ember.},
url = {https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/australia-vs-brazil/}
} Permalink: https://worldpowermonitor.com/compare/australia-vs-brazil/
The Copy buttons add today's date as the access date.